Minutes, IBIS Quality Task Group 01 October 2019 11:00-12:00 EST (08:00-09:00 PST) ROLL CALL Intel Corp. Michael Mirmak Mentor, a Siemens Business Arpad Muranyi Signal Integrity Software: * Mike LaBonte SPISim Wei-hsing Huang Teraspeed Labs: * Bob Ross Zuken USA: Lance Wang Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for IBIS related patent disclosures: - None Call for opens: - None Review of previous meeting minutes: Minutes from the September 24 meeting were reviewed. Bob Ross moved to approve the minutes. Mike LaBonte seconded. Without objection the minutes were approved. ARs: - None IBISCHK700 parser development: Bob Ross said the developer was implementing changes based on our feedback, especially related to not allowing backslashes in file names. The primary problem was a file reference to a subdirectory using a forward slash in the [File Name] keyword, found in a regression testcase. Mike LaBonte said whatever directory the .ibs file was in was the root directory, so there should be no directory elements there. Bob agreed, saying it was an error if [File Name] had a directory path. He was not sure when new code would be ready, but he expected it would be a small fix. IBISCHK7 source code license: Bob Ross said we had 6 agreements signed, 3 had paid. Bob said there was a question from Intel about the license for our freely available executables. Mike LaBonte noted that we do not have it in writing that they are freely available. He suggested a note on the IBISCHK web page might suffice. Bob said source code licensees can compile their own executables, and the agreement permits them to distribute those, even with modifications. He noted that license payments received so far were enough to cover the initial development payment. New IBISCHK bugs: Bob Ross noted that BUG207 had not yet been classified. Mike LaBonte said he preferred to make mismatches between I-V and V-T tables a warning, not an error, when [Add Submodel] and/or [Driver Schedule] were present. Bob said the waveforms of the top model were not to include those I-V tables. Mike asked, if the top-level waveforms did not apply to the overall combined buffer behavior, where would the information to give the turn-on time characteristic for the Submodels come from? Bob said Submodel was a block to be added to the main model. For example for a delayed clamp, and it could have its own waveforms. He described the differences between [Submodel] and [Driver Schedule]. Mike said that if the top model waveform must not include Submodel, hardware measurement could not be performed. Bob said it could be performed if the buffer had controls to disable the extra driver(s). He said any code changes for BUG207 would break existing models. Mike felt that relaxing a rule could not make existing models begin to fail. But he agreed that no change seemed necessary, as long as the top-level I-V and V-T needed to be matched. IBIS-ISS parser: - Tabled. Mike LaBonte moved to adjourn. Bob Ross seconded. Without objection the meeting ended. Meeting ended: 12:05 ET Next meeting October 8, 2019